WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced a ban on new foreign-made drones on Monday, specifically affecting popular models from Chinese manufacturers including DJI and Autel. This action underlines rising national security concerns as these drones have established a significant presence across various fields such as agriculture, law enforcement, and media.
This ban comes one year after Congress passed a defense bill focused on the risks posed by Chinese drones. The legislation mandated a review that aimed to restrict these drones from entering the U.S. market based on potential risks to national security, with a deadline for review set for December 23.
Following the review, the FCC determined that all foreign-manufactured drones and key components present unacceptable risks to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of U.S. persons. However, exceptions will be made for specific drones and components if verified by the Pentagon or Department of Homeland Security as safe.
The commission's decision was influenced by the need for heightened security surrounding significant upcoming events, including the 2026 World Cup, the America250 celebrations, and the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, which pose potential threats from criminals, hostile foreign entities, and terrorists.
Michael Robbins, president of the Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI), expressed support for the FCC's decision, highlighting the necessity for the U.S. to reduce reliance on foreign equipment and to encourage domestic drone production.
Robbins emphasized the urgency for increased production and secured supply chains in light of recent geopolitical events, referencing Beijing's tendency to restrict essential materials like rare earth magnets.
In response to the ruling, DJI conveyed disappointment, arguing that the concerns regarding data security have been unfounded and are more reflective of protectionist policies rather than evidence-based reasoning.
Individuals in various industries have voiced mixed sentiments about the ban. For instance, Texas drone operator Gene Robinson lamented the impact this could have on his work in law enforcement, asserting the benefits of DJI drones in terms of performance and affordability. On the other hand, avatar Hylio's CEO Arthur Erickson suggested that the absence of DJI could open opportunities for American drone manufacturers and reduce costs in the long run.
Despite these hopeful viewpoints, Erickson called the FCC's broad extension of the ban to all foreign-made drones and parts crazy, urging for clarification on the policy's scope as many rely on a global supply chain.
