Not far enough, says Texas mom Elizabeth Cardner, who welcomed Meta’s new limits for teens as a sign that more people are aware of social media’s dangers. But she warns it may not solve the deeper issue.
Meta’s $18bn settlement with 48 U.S. states – and Washington, D.C. and three territories – comes amid accusations this tech giant knowingly engineered addiction among children and violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. The payoff includes a two‑hour daily limit, hidden like counts, no autoplay, muted school‑time notifications and bans on extreme makeup filters. The company will also tighten age verification, introduce parental controls and appoint an independent auditor.
Cardner’s 14‑year‑old Paige said the new rules would reduce “fake” content and give “more real‑life scenarios.” But she fears AI‑generated filters will outpace these limits. “People will find new ways to fake filters,” Paige warned, noting that such changes may only offer a temporary relief.
Boston mom Andria Rose called the settlement “a couple of dollar bills” compared to Meta’s yearly revenue. She feels stuck: “Even if I protect my kids, Facebook and Instagram are still drawing them out of their rooms.” Rose described the move as “fantastic” yet incomplete, warning that the company’s control of addictive design still persists.
Long‑Island’s Joanie Story criticized the requirement that Meta hold $5bn until other platforms—YouTube, TikTok, etc.—join similar deals. She views it as “petty” but acknowledges the limits could help prevent her two sons’ earlier exposure to alarming content, one of whom has needed therapy for four years.
In Chicago, Mark SooHoo champions delaying smartphone access until after eighth grade. He argues that hand‑holding technophiles in the tech industry is insufficient; collective parental action is required to shield kids from the digital world’s “negative impacts.”
