Photo of Pauline Hanson and Senator Mehreen Faruqi

In a verdict that strengthens protections against hate speech, the Federal Court of Australia upheld a 2024 ruling that Pauline Hanson, chair of the One Nation party, had breached the Racial Discrimination Act when she responded to a condolence post by Senator Mehreen Faruqi with an alleged “go back to Pakistan” message.

The tweet, sent on the same day that Queen Elizabeth II died in 2022, was described by the court as a variant of the long‑used “go back” slogan that targets Muslims. Judge Angus Stewart, in his 2024 opinion, noted that the phrase was a racist trope with a history of alienating Muslim Australians and was “implicitly” aimed at that group. He ordered Hanson to delete the tweet and pay Faruqi’s legal costs.

Far uqi, deputy leader of the Greens, said the court’s decision was a win for those who feel their belonging in Australia is conditional. “Hate speech is not free speech,” she added in a statement outside the courthouse.

Hanson expressed disappointment in the judgment and announced that her advisers would consider a High Court appeal. The case follows a string of public comments by the senator, including a 2023 interview in which she dismissed “good” Muslims and a podcast with far‑right activist Tommy Robinson where she admitted Australia was riddled with “violent Africans” after the end of the White Australia policy.

The ruling carries broader implications for political speech in Australia. The court’s endorsement of the Racial Discrimination Act positions the judiciary as a check on inflammatory rhetoric from public figures, reinforcing that no one is immune from responsibility when their words create a hostile environment for protected groups.