‘Married at First Sight’ Australia has come under new scrutiny after a BBC investigation revealed that some contestants were not told about their on‑screen partners’ previous drug charges and violent criminal convictions. The report said the omissions were "serious and disturbing" and prompted the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) and the UK regulator Ofcom to review the programs.
ACMA acknowledged the gravity of the allegations, stating that its jurisdiction covers whether broadcast content meets industry codes. It reiterated that the regulator could only investigate compliance with those codes and encouraged the public to contact broadcasters or relevant authorities for concerns that fall outside its remit. In a similar vein, Ofcom described the latest claims as "deeply concerning" and emphasised that Channel 4 would review them as part of its ongoing investigation into UK participant welfare.
The controversies stem from a selection process that reportedly allows men who have been convicted of or accused of violence or drug activity to appear on the show. In Australia, Channel 9 and production house Endemol Shine Australia argue that a multi‑stage vetting system protects participants. That system, according to them, includes police and criminal‑history checks in every country a participant has lived in, independent psychological assessment, medical screening, statutory declarations and digital due‑diligence.
Channel 4, which broadcasts the UK version of MAFS, added it has no editorial control over the Australian series and keeps its own programmes separate. Yet the network has already removed all UK episodes from its streaming service All 4, and its external review on contributor welfare is scheduled for release later this summer.
The show itself follows a premise common in reality TV: strangers agree to marry after one meeting, with the marriage not legally binding but forming the basis for a televised relationship. Participants travel on honeymoon‑style trips and eventually live together, all while the cameras roll day after day.
Nine of the Australian stars requested the BBC that rules be tightened. They argued background checks should exclude contestants with past convictions. The show’s producers insist their protocols are stringent, yet the scrutiny spotlights a gap in the reality‑TV landscape where participant safety can be crucial yet unprotected.
Getty Images
