US Reduces Childhood Vaccine Recommendations, Experts Warn of Risks

Thu Jan 08 2026 03:05:18 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

In a controversial move, the U.S. government has cut the number of mandatory vaccines for children, opening the door for families to make more choices. Medical experts express concerns over potential public health implications.

In a sweeping adjustment to the childhood vaccination schedule, the U.S. has reduced the number of vaccines it officially recommends for children, sparking significant debate among health professionals. While officials reassured that access and insurance coverage for vaccines will remain unaffected, critics worry this could lead to decreased vaccination rates and heightened risk of preventable diseases. The change follows a directive from President Trump for the Department of Health to realign recommendations with practices from other countries. Experts argue that the lack of public discourse on this decision may endanger children's health.

WASHINGTON (AP) — In an unprecedented move, the U.S. government has announced a significant overhaul to its childhood vaccination recommendations, effectively reducing the number of vaccines advised for children. This change leaves certain vaccinations, including flu shots, up to family discretion without any clear guidance from health authorities.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) stated that this revision aims to enhance public trust by only recommending the most critical vaccinations for children, following a directive from President Donald Trump in December 2025 that instructed a review of practices in other developed nations.

Despite assurances that families will not lose access to vaccinations or insurance coverage, many medical experts have condemned the decision. They argue that such a reduction could lead to a decline in vaccination rates, increasing the likelihood of disease outbreaks.

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. expressed that the step is designed to protect children while respecting parental choice, stating, “This decision protects children, respects families, and rebuilds trust in public health.”

Conversely, experts like Michael Osterholm from the Vaccine Integrity Project at the University of Minnesota warn that abandoning vaccines for illnesses such as influenza and hepatitis, without a transparent review process, exposes children to substantial health risks. Osterholm cautioned, “This will lead to more hospitalizations and preventable deaths among American children.”

The public response remains to be seen, as the debate continues over the implications of this pivotal decision on child health and community safety.