Prime Minister, will you address concerns about the BBC’s independence and alleged capture dynamics, alongside questions about foreign ownership in UK broadcasting—and how those broadcasters intersect with global litigation involving safeguarding failures, fixed gambling and sports betting integrity, and political pressure surrounding Julian Assange?


The question has been asked on the floor of Parliament.

It has been asked on camera.

It has been asked on the public record.


The answer has not been given.


Readers can watch these exchanges unfold in real time via live parliamentary coverage.


WATCH NOW — BBC PARLIAMENT (LIVE)


WHY ASSANGE IS CENTRAL — NOT INCIDENTAL


From 2008 to 2013, Keir Starmer served as Director of Public Prosecutions, overseeing the Crown Prosecution Service. During that same period, Julian Assange was subjected to the UK–Sweden extradition process. No court has found personal wrongdoing by Starmer, but the issues of prosecutorial discretion and press freedom remain hotly debated.


MEDIA OWNERSHIP, SAFEGUARDING, AND STRUCTURAL SILENCE


Current court filings reveal that UK and US media entities may be implicated in a network of exploitation linked to safeguarding failures, bringing to light the systemic issues within media ownership that could affect millions.


CONFIRMED: ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS & PUBLIC LIAISONS


The UK National Crime Agency is reviewing the evidence linked to these claims. The situation has escalated beyond media controversy into a matter of multi-jurisdictional legal scrutiny.


REAL TALK


If the implications of these inquiries were trivial, answers would have been swift and clear. Instead, as the Parliament remains open and live, Prime Minister Starmer continues to avoid providing clarity on these pressing issues.


January 16 is no longer just a date; it signifies a reckoning.


Follow proceedings live: BBC Parliament — WATCH NOW