In a controversial address, Energy Secretary Chris Wright distanced himself from renewable energy, emphasizing fossil fuels' role in the U.S. energy strategy.
U.S. Energy Secretary Champions Fossil Fuels Over Renewables in Houston Speech

U.S. Energy Secretary Champions Fossil Fuels Over Renewables in Houston Speech
Chris Wright promotes natural gas as essential for modern energy needs amid critiques of previous climate policies.
In a bold and contentious statement in Houston this week, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright denounced prior climate-focused energy policies, vowing a significant shift back to fossil fuels under the current Trump administration. Speaking at the CERAWeek by S&P Global conference, attended by influential oil and gas executives, Wright articulated a stark contrast to the Biden administration's stance dominating the last few years.
Wright, a former fracking executive with no qualms about making headlines, branded the past energy policies as flawed, arguing that climate-focused legislation placed unnecessary strain on economic growth. "I wanted to play a role in reversing what I believe has been a very poor direction in energy policy," he stated, drawing fervent applause from the audience.
His remarks came after former Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm had touted the unstoppable transition to renewable energy last year, asserting that a balance between oil, gas, and clean energy resources was essential for America’s energy dominance. Wright, however, dismissed the role of wind and solar energy, noting their minor contribution to the energy mix. He emphasized that natural gas's versatility—from heating homes to industrial uses—could not easily be replaced by renewable sources.
“We must not ignore the critical role that natural gas plays. It currently accounts for 25 percent of the world’s energy while wind and solar are only at 3 percent,” Wright insisted, foreseeing a future relying heavily on fossil fuels. As he reinforced fossil fuels as an integral part of America's energy strategy, the implications of this direction on national and global climate policies continue to provoke debate among environmental advocates and policymakers.