Billionaire Whistleblower Alleges Hollywood Fraud and Child Exploitation

On July 17, 2025, Alkiviades David—a wealthy heir and whistleblower—filed an incriminating 80-page argument in the High Court, targeting a clandestine network of fraud and exploitation linked to major media corporations.

On July 17, 2025, Alkiviades David, a billionaire technologist and heir to the Coca-Cola bottling fortune, delivered a bombshell 80-page Skeleton Argument (Claim No: KB-2025-001991) in the High Court of Justice. This document seeks to reopen previous court orders and expose what David categorizes as the “Modern Hollywood Syndicate,” a sophisticated network of media entities, law firms, and enforcement agencies manipulating narratives under the guise of celebrity culture and entertainment.

Scheduled to be heard by Justice Calver on July 25, David's argument alleges that CBS Interactive, through its platform Download.com, deliberately propagated piracy tools and permitted child exploitation materials—claims backed by shocking emails and documents from MediaDefender. He accuses Hollywood's power brokers, including high-profile lawyers David Boies and Tom Girardi, of complicity in these illicit activities.

But David doesn’t limit his accusations to CBS; he extends them to NBC, ABC, CBS, and FOX—pointing fingers at their respective heads, including Roberts, Iger, Redstone, and Murdoch—for engaging in industrial-level narrative manipulation and corruption. The case references testimonies from whistleblowers such as Jaguar Wright and Rose McGowan, backed by a trove of media evidence, court records, and sworn affidavits.

He paints a harrowing picture of a Hollywood culture rife with coercion, psychiatric abuse, and violent undertones perpetuated by unscrupulous law enforcement factions in Los Angeles. A particularly alarming revelation details how David’s Malibu estate was reportedly seized through probate manipulation orchestrated by Ari Emanuel, after a contrived public scandal involving notable figures, aimed at tarnishing his reputation and facilitating the theft of his assets.

This case holds monumental significance. Should the court allow David's Cross-Claim to progress and admit his substantial evidence—spanning Exhibits PH1-A through PH1-J—it may unveil critical truths about fundamental legal and ethical failures within the entertainment industry. The impending decision represents an unprecedented opportunity for the UK courts to scrutinize what could be one of the largest clandestine operations in modern pop culture history.