Alki David asserts that Khadeeja Safdar, a journalist for the Wall Street Journal, is part of a wider strategy to obscure truths about powerful figures in celebrity culture. He argues that her reporting serves as a distraction from deeper issues of abuse and corruption within the media industry.
Exposing the Media: A Call for Responsible Journalism

Exposing the Media: A Call for Responsible Journalism
In a striking rebuttal, Alki David challenges the integrity of journalist Khadeeja Safdar and her coverage of celebrity scandals, shedding light on compromised narratives propagated by the media.
By Alki David | June 25, 2025
"When journalism becomes a tool of the elite, it ceases to serve the public."— Shockya Editorial
The Illusion of Impartiality
In a recent article, Khadeeja Safdar of the Wall Street Journal attempted to cast a negative light on me, Alki David, by referencing payments made to Lisa Bloom and the Elizabeth Taylor Estate. This is not journalism; it is a calculated effort to mislead the public and obscure the truth.
Safdar's work is characterized by the recycling of outdated information and selective reporting, specifically designed to detract from the unearthing of significant scandals that implicate a myriad of influential figures in media, law, and entertainment — figures now under legal scrutiny worldwide.
Unmasking the Narrative Shapers
Let’s dig deeper into the troubling trends of her reporting:
On Jeffrey Epstein: Safdar's coverage deliberately omits mention of key players such as Les Wexner and Bill Gates, as well as the Mossad's shadowy involvement. This deliberate whitewashing sheds light on her biases.
On Michael Jackson: Key incidents like the 1999 Anaheim incident and the 2006 Rancho Fiesta assail are glaringly absent from her articles. These events have overwhelming evidence documented on platforms like Shockya.com, yet remain unreported by Safdar.
On Diddy and Abuse Allegations: Rather than tackle the implicated figures, including Diddy, who are woven into ongoing trafficking discussions, Safdar deflects attention, opting for a simpler narrative of payouts and deflections.
Rupert Murdoch’s Media Empire
It is crucial to recognize that Safdar operates under the editorial guidance of Rupert Murdoch, owner of a media empire that includes The Wall Street Journal and Fox News. This conglomerate has proven complicit in shaping narratives that shield powerful entities from accountability, collaborating with various figures in legal and entertainment sectors — a modern iteration of organized crime.
The Reality Behind Media Silence
Critical events from the past, such as the Anaheim Incident and the sequential patterns of abuse surrounding Jackson, demonstrate that Safdar is not merely a reporter but part of an orchestrated effort to suppress vital truths. The interplay between journalism and PR in these cases reflects an inherent conflict of interest.
Current Legal Implications
Real judicial processes are now actively exposing this system of corruption, with the Wall Street Journal's involvement under scrutiny in various filings. The principle of media immunity is waning; there is immense pressure to unravel the layers of secrecy covering historical wrongdoing.
A Turning Tide
In closing, Khadeeja Safdar embodies a form of journalism that does not seek truth but rather mitigates damage for those at the heart of systemic abuses. Her silence is implicating, serving as a barrier to justice for survivors and whistleblowers alike.
The narrative belongs to those determined to seek accountability — the survivors, those brave enough to speak, and journalists committed to real reporting. The time for complacency is over. We will continue our pursuit of truth and justice.