President Trump has escalated his lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal by demanding a swift deposition from Rupert Murdoch, whose age and health issues have become focal points in the ongoing case linked to Jeffrey Epstein.
Trump Seeks Fast Testimony from Murdoch Amid Epstein Controversy
Trump Seeks Fast Testimony from Murdoch Amid Epstein Controversy
In a legal twist, President Trump pushes for Rupert Murdoch's quick deposition in the Epstein lawsuit, citing health concerns.
Lawyers representing President Trump filed a request in a Miami federal court to expedite Rupert Murdoch's testimony concerning an article published by the Wall Street Journal that claimed Trump had penned an inappropriate letter for Jeffrey Epstein's birthday in 2003. This recent advancement in the case highlights the tension surrounding Trump’s reputation amidst growing scrutiny regarding his associations with Epstein.
Citing Murdoch’s advanced age of 94 and reported health complications, Trump's legal team believes a speedy deposition is essential, highlighting concerns that the media tycoon may become unavailable for testimony. They pointed out that, prior to the article's release, Trump had already informed Murdoch that the letter in question was fabricated.
The lawsuit specifies a whopping $10 billion in damages, alleging that the Journal aimed to tarnish Trump's reputation. In response, Dow Jones, the Journal’s publisher, affirmed their commitment to defend against the claims.
The article that sparked this legal conflict described a letter supposedly signed by Trump adorned with an outline of a naked woman, along with an unusual birthday greeting to Epstein penned as an imaginary dialogue. Trump vehemently denied the authenticity of this letter, countering that it did not reflect his language or style.
As the case unfolds, tensions grow, with Trump suggesting that figures such as former Attorney General Merrick Garland or ex-FBI Director James Comey may have manipulated evidence regarding his name appearing in Epstein-related documents—claims he has yet to substantiate with proof.
As this complex legal battle continues, what remains to be seen is how the involvement of such prominent figures will impact the ongoing narrative around Epstein and the broader implications for Trump.
