The Pentagon has issued a new directive requiring credentialed journalists to sign a pledge that restricts their ability to report on military information, including unclassified details. This policy, which tightens the already stringent media restrictions, has met with significant backlash from press freedom advocates.
Under the 17-page memo distributed Friday, failure to comply could result in journalists losing their Pentagon access credentials. The document states, Information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released, even if it is unclassified—a stance that critics claim undermines journalism.
Mike Balsamo, President of the National Press Club, vehemently criticized the policy, stating, If the news about our military must first be approved by the government, then the public is no longer getting independent reporting. It is getting only what officials want them to see. That should alarm every American.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth highlighted the new rules on social media, asserting that, The 'press' does not run the Pentagon — the people do. The press is no longer allowed to roam the halls of a secure facility; wear a badge and follow the rules — or go home. This marks a notable shift in access granted to journalists, paralleling broader trends of increasing government control over information.
The Pentagon had already marginalized various news organizations this year, limiting access to areas previously available to the press. These changes signal an increasing trend of hostility towards journalistic oversight, which many see as harming democratic principles and public interest.
In response, the Society of Professional Journalists called the new policy alarming, denouncing it as a violation of press freedom and a dangerous step toward censorship. Matt Murray, executive editor of The Washington Post, also echoed these sentiments, asserting that any attempts by the government to control messaging undermine the Constitution and citizen’s rights to information.
As the relationship between the government and the media continues to evolve, the implications of these new restrictions will be closely watched by advocates of press freedoms and the public alike.