Skip to main content
The Flux Daily
PoliticsLondon, Hungary, Venezuela

The Lessons from Wobbling Structures: Democracy at a Crossroads

Exploring the fragility of democratic systems through the lens of historical events.

By Amanda TaubSource: nytimes.com1 min read
The Lessons from Wobbling Structures: Democracy at a Crossroads
Image via nytimes.com

In brief

An examination of how synchronous movements in society can threaten democratic stability, taking examples from Hungary and Venezuela.

On June 10, 2000, London unveiled the Millennium Footbridge, a stunning architectural feat designed to span the River Thames like a flowing ribbon of steel. However, as pedestrians congregated, the bridge started to wobble dramatically from side to side. Engineers quickly determined that its design was based on the assumption that people would walk randomly. Instead, the collective cadence of the crowd amplified their movements, leading to an alarming instability. After only two days, the bridge was closed for costly adjustments. This incident has sparked reflections on the fragility of democratic systems. My recent exploration into the intricacies of democracy illustrates how stabilizing forces, like checks and balances, function similarly to suspension cables supporting a bridge. However, external pressures can easily tip this balance, leading to institutional collapse.Take Hungary as a case in point. A peculiar constitutional amendment granted Prime Minister Viktor Orban a supermajority in parliament, allowing him to alter the constitution virtually without oversight. Orban capitalized on this power to fortify his regime, effectively disbanding liberal democracy by transforming judicial and media entities into extensions of his authority, rather than their intended roles as checks.Similarly, Venezuela's democratic framework faces peril due to a Supreme Court ruling early in Hugo Chávez's presidency. In a controversial move, Chávez initiated a referendum to replace the nation’s constitution despite it violating the existing amendment procedures. The Supreme Court validated this maneuver, enabling Chávez to consolidate control over essential state institutions, a command that persisted even after his death, with Nicolás Maduro continuing his legacy.As we navigate the current state of democracies worldwide, it becomes crucial to identify the factors that can sway systems off their equilibrium. Understanding the potential for wobble within democratic structures is not only pertinent but essential for ensuring stability going forward.

Topics

More on this story