Charlie Kirk’s mastery of social media was key to his rise as an influence in conservative politics. So the extent to which his death and its aftermath have played out on those forums shouldn’t come as a surprise.
In a microcosm of life today, social media is where Americans have gone to process last week’s killing in Utah and is the chief tool his supporters are using to police those they feel aren’t offering proper respect. Investigators are probing the time the man accused of killing Kirk, Tyler Robinson, spent in the 'dark corners of the internet'—leading up to when he allegedly pulled the trigger.
Utah Governor Spencer Cox described social media as a 'cancer' that has hacked our brains and incited outrage. Democratic Senator Brian Schatz encouraged a break from social media urging Americans to engage in more personal activities rather than let algorithms dictate their lives.
Following Kirk's assassination on September 10, videos of the incident flooded platforms like X, TikTok, and YouTube as companies struggled to contain their spread. Experts highlight how divisive content is pushed by algorithms to maximize engagement, often at the cost of societal cohesion.
Laura Edelson, a professor and social media expert, argued that the current digital landscape is redefining how we interact with each other and society. In light of these events, influential figures such as Ben Shapiro, a friend of Kirk's, were vocal about the 'disaster' that social media now represents, contributing to societal division and unrest.
In an environment where inflammatory posts reign, accusations and calls for accountability have surged across platforms. A notable example includes GOP Rep. Randy Fine’s request for public employees to be highlighted for negative comments against Kirk.
As this discourse continues, lawmakers express concerns regarding the harmful effects of misinformation and the need for society to reconnect. The situation in Nepal, where social media bans led to protests and violence, reflects the potential dangers posed by governmental actions against online platforms, showcasing the high stakes tied to this discourse.
Ultimately, the collective challenge remains: how to navigate a landscape driven by algorithms that often promote division and hostility.