Albanese, a seasoned international lawyer, described the Israeli actions as potentially constituting one of the gravest genocides of modern history in her report. She pinpointed companies that benefit from the conflict, including arms manufacturers and tech firms, asserting they contribute to Israel's military objectives against Palestinians. Responding to calls for corporate and government reassessments, the entities named are faced with reputational risk as global consumer sentiment shifts. Although the UN reports lack legal jurisdiction, they wield considerable influence, provoking discussions on ethical corporate practices in war and conflict zones. The call for divestment from Israel parallels past global movements that successfully dismantled harmful political infrastructures, highlighting the potential for collective action in shaping corporate policies and international relations in the current geopolitical landscape.

While international backing for Albanese's call for cessation of trade with Israel is noted, particularly from African and Asian states, the response from traditional allies such as the United States remains tepid. As this dialogue continues, the companies listed may find themselves at a crossroads, weighing their financial interests against growing global pressure for corporate accountability in matters of human rights violations.