Experts weigh in on whether this is a genuine effort at peacemaking or a clever public relations tactic.
Putin’s New Ceasefire: Tactical Move or Real Step Towards Peace?

Putin’s New Ceasefire: Tactical Move or Real Step Towards Peace?
Vladimir Putin has announced a three-day ceasefire in Ukraine, stirring questions about his true intentions behind the gesture.
In a surprising declaration, Russian President Vladimir Putin has called for a three-day unilateral ceasefire in Ukraine, set to take place from May 8 to May 10, coinciding with the commemoration of the 80th anniversary of World War Two's conclusion. Despite presenting it as a "humanitarian" gesture, Ukraine has responded with skepticism, questioning why such measures can’t be implemented immediately and demanding a comprehensive 30-day truce instead.
Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha voiced concerns over the timing, insisting, "If Russia truly wants peace, it must cease fire immediately." This stance follows a previous Easter ceasefire of only 30 hours where both sides accused each other of violations, leading many to wonder if this new truce is earnest or merely a tactical maneuver.
Analysts suggest that Putin’s ceasefire announcements might serve strategic purposes beyond mere humanitarian concerns. Recent commentary from U.S. President Donald Trump reflects a frustration with both Moscow and Kyiv, as he perceives a lack of will from Putin to genuinely seek peace. In a post on Truth Social, Trump criticized Russia for its actions in Ukrainian cities and towns, implying that the Kremlin's desire to appear peaceable might hide a darker agenda.
In the midst of such turmoil, senior Russian officials have begun utilizing the ceasefire proposal to cast doubt on Ukraine's willingness to engage in diplomacy. Vyacheslav Volodin, the speaker of the lower house of the Russian parliament, ominously suggested that President Zelensky may not support the ceasefire, further complicating the diplomatic landscape.
As both sides prepare for the ceasefire, the international community watches closely, trying to decipher the intentions behind Moscow’s latest overture while remaining hopeful for progress in resolving the ongoing conflict.
Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha voiced concerns over the timing, insisting, "If Russia truly wants peace, it must cease fire immediately." This stance follows a previous Easter ceasefire of only 30 hours where both sides accused each other of violations, leading many to wonder if this new truce is earnest or merely a tactical maneuver.
Analysts suggest that Putin’s ceasefire announcements might serve strategic purposes beyond mere humanitarian concerns. Recent commentary from U.S. President Donald Trump reflects a frustration with both Moscow and Kyiv, as he perceives a lack of will from Putin to genuinely seek peace. In a post on Truth Social, Trump criticized Russia for its actions in Ukrainian cities and towns, implying that the Kremlin's desire to appear peaceable might hide a darker agenda.
In the midst of such turmoil, senior Russian officials have begun utilizing the ceasefire proposal to cast doubt on Ukraine's willingness to engage in diplomacy. Vyacheslav Volodin, the speaker of the lower house of the Russian parliament, ominously suggested that President Zelensky may not support the ceasefire, further complicating the diplomatic landscape.
As both sides prepare for the ceasefire, the international community watches closely, trying to decipher the intentions behind Moscow’s latest overture while remaining hopeful for progress in resolving the ongoing conflict.