After being mistakenly added to a group chat with top U.S. security officials, journalist Jeffrey Goldberg exposes sensitive military operation details, prompting fierce backlash from the Trump administration.
Signal Slip-Up: Trump's Team Faces Fallout After Journalist's Bombshell Report

Signal Slip-Up: Trump's Team Faces Fallout After Journalist's Bombshell Report
Jeffrey Goldberg's shocking revelations from a leaked Signal chat unleash a storm of criticism from Trump officials.
Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, finds himself at the center of a political maelstrom after uncovering sensitive information while inadvertently participating in a group chat with senior Trump administration officials on the encrypted messaging app, Signal. It all began when Goldberg received an unexpected message from a group purportedly led by National Security Advisor Michael Waltz, who later claimed it was a mistake.
Goldberg shares that he initially dismissed the message as a prank but soon found himself engulfed in conversations among top officials, including CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, discussing crucial details of a planned military operation in Yemen. Despite their belief in the app's security, the officials did not seem aware of his presence until he published a piece detailing his access to their chat.
Following the publication, Goldberg faced severe criticism, being labeled a "loser" and a "sleazebag" by President Trump and dismissed as a liar by Waltz, who insisted he had no relationship with the journalist despite Goldberg’s claim of having met him multiple times. The controversy intensified as sensational details emerged from the chat regarding the timing and specifics of the Yemen strikes.
Goldberg made the decision to leave the chat group, a move which some fellow journalists questioned, but he felt it was necessary due to the ongoing legal and ethical implications. In his articles, he highlighted the distinction between the treatment of high-ranking officials who mishandle sensitive information and the accountability of lower-ranking personnel in the military.
As the Trump administration continues to rally in defense of its officials and dismiss Goldberg’s claims, the incident raises critical questions regarding national security protocols and the management of classified information. The fallout is likely to extend into broader discussions of accountability within the administration, with calls for investigations coming from both Democratic and some Republican lawmakers.