Syria's National Dialogue: Promises Unmet Amid Disappointment

Recent discussions in Syria have highlighted skepticism regarding the new government's dedication to building an inclusive political landscape, sparking disappointment among participants.

It was anticipated as a pivotal moment for Syria as the nation began to transition from years of oppressive rule. However, the “national dialogue” hosted over two days in Damascus left many attendees expressing disillusionment. The conference, which aimed to gather various sectors of society to foster a genuinely inclusive government, instead raised eyebrows about the government's commitment to openness and transparency.

One of the participants, Ibrahim Draji—a law professor at Damascus University—summed up the disappointment, stating, “There’s no transparency. There is no clear criteria for who gets invited.” His sentiments echoed among many who had hoped to be part of a historic event that would shape Syria’s future.

Previously, the coalition of rebels that had recently displaced the long-time dictator Bashar al-Assad had openly vowed to create a representative form of governance. This national dialogue was touted as the inaugural step toward building a government that would represent the interests of all Syrians. However, the reality as conveyed by conference participants suggests the new Islamist ruling faction may not be as dedicated to inclusivity as once declared.

As the gathering commenced in the presidential palace in Damascus, representatives from diverse backgrounds and viewpoints were expected to collaborate on a new path for their country. Yet, as many departed from the conference, their hopes were overshadowed by doubts about whether the new leadership could navigate the complexity of unifying a deeply divided nation.