In brief
On 2026‑11‑06 Tunisian Foreign Minister Mohamed Ali Nafti pledged a comprehensive strategy to prevent Tunisian territory from becoming a transit hub for irregular migrants. The plan balances security enforcement with humanitarian and development efforts and stresses cooperation with origin, transit and destination countries. The source notes no particular uncertainties about the policy’s future effectiveness.
On Thursday, 2026‑11‑06, Tunisian Foreign Minister Mohamed Ali Nafti announced that the country would deepen efforts to combat migrant smuggling and reject any attempt to make its land a transit or settlement point for irregular migrants.
Commitment Across Security and Humanitarian Dimensions
Nafti said the Tunisian government will safeguard national sovereignty, protect its borders and crack down on migrant smuggling and human trafficking networks. He added that Tunisia’s approach extends beyond security concerns to include humanitarian and development aspects, respecting migrants’ dignity and rights.
Highlighting the source’s report from private radio station Mosaique FM, Nafti described a comprehensive and balanced strategy that supports regular, organized migration channels while countering irregular migration. The policy also aims to address root causes such as poverty, unemployment and socio‑economic disparities that drive people to dangerous routes.
In a call for broader partnership, Nafti urged stronger cooperation and solidarity among countries of origin, transit and destination. He framed such collaboration as a shared responsibility to achieve sustainable migration management, a principle he emphasized throughout the announcement.
Tunisia is also bolstering coordination with the International Organization for Migration. The ministry is working to enhance voluntary return assistance and reintegration programs so that migrants who wish to return home can do so safely and with dignity.
While the statement outlines a clear policy direction, the source does not elaborate on specifics such as anticipated timelines, operational details, or legal frameworks that will be employed to implement these measures.
Uncertainties highlighted by the source are limited to the effectiveness of the measures and how the initiatives will translate into tangible reductions in smuggling activity. No additional questions regarding the policy implementation were named in the statement or accompanying coverage.
