Landmark US housing bill becomes law despite Trump protest



Donald Trump

President Donald Trump allowed the 21st Century Road to Housing Act to become law overnight on Friday, despite having refused to sign it earlier in protest over Congress’s failure to pass voter ID legislation.



The bill, approved by both chambers of Congress in June, contains more than 40 provisions aimed at lowering costs for renters and homebuyers while expanding the supply of affordable homes. It includes measures that streamline home‑building approval processes and cap institutional investors’ purchase of single‑family homes nationwide.



Among its key features is a mandate that the United States require voters to provide ID and citizenship proof—known as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (SAVE). Trump’s stance on SAVE has become a rallying point for Republicans who wish to prioritize the legislation over other domestic policy matters.



Vice president of the Bipartisan Policy Center, Dennis Shea, hailed the law as a significant milestone: "Getting Congress to move on housing supply and affordability has been a long time coming, and the American people made clear they were ready for it."



The median price of existing homes hit an all‑time high in June, reaching $440,660, a sharp rise that many families find unaffordable. A 2026 report by the National Association of Realtors notes that a typical family would need an annual income of about $117,000 to afford an average U.S. home—a figure that far exceeds the median household earnings.



Republicans argue that the SAVE Act is necessary to protect election integrity, while Democrats counter that the bill may reduce voter turnout by limiting access to voting. Following Trump’s social media post, House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries criticized the administration’s stance: "Republicans would rather make it harder to vote than easier to afford a home."



The legislation’s passage marks a rare moment of bipartisan cooperation in a politically divided Congress, raising questions about future policy priorities and the balance of social versus electoral reforms as the 2026 elections approach.