NEW YORK — The images from detention centers, whether taken a century ago or today, reveal a landscape of power and punishment. Displaying confined individuals under the watchful gaze of authorities has become a visual hallmark intersecting politics and criminal justice.

These images have been thrust into the national spotlight, particularly under the Trump administration, which used them to bolster its hardline stance on immigration. With recruiting ads for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reflecting these stark realities, the portrayal of detainees serves a dual purpose: assertion of authority and a warning to potential immigrants.

In a notable, unsettling event, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem visited an infamous Salvadoran prison, mimicking a traditional political photo-op. Captured with shirtless inmates in chains, Noem painted a grim picture for undocumented immigrants in the U.S., implying they could face a similar fate.

These stark representations echo throughout history, from prison pictures in the mid-20th century to early 20th-century photographs of racialized laborers under confinement. Each snapshot is an artifact showcasing both governmental control and societal sentiment.

Such imagery raises ethical questions—are detainees being reduced to mere instruments of political discourse? This question forces society to confront bias, as historical contexts show how race and class influence the perception of those depicted.

According to sociology experts, these visuals not only influence public opinion but also galvanize political action. Political ads have historically leveraged this imagery, manipulating emotions and reinforcing stereotypes about crime and punishment.

As dialogue around criminal justice reform grows louder, advocates from various organizations aim to challenge the stigma surrounding detainees and emphasize their humanity. The hope is to educate the public, dismantle prejudiced narratives, and create a more humane approach to justice.

In the end, the crucial challenge lies in discerning the narratives these powerful images convey and how they implicate viewers in historical and contemporary contexts of power.