The release of thousands of pages of documents related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's abuse by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has left some who were anxiously awaiting the files disappointed. By law, the DOJ had to make all materials public by the end of Friday. But only some have been released, many with numerous redactions.
Lawmakers who pushed for these documents to see the light of day have described the DOJ's efforts as insincere, and legal experts say that the redactions may only fuel ongoing conspiracy theories. We just want all of the evidence of these crimes out there, Epstein survivor Liz Stein told the BBC.
Stein expressed concern that the DOJ was "really brazenly going against the Epstein Files Transparency Act" - the law requiring full document release. Survivors fear a slow roll-out of incomplete information without any context.
Another survivor, Marina Lacerda, who was 14 when she endured abuse by Epstein, echoed Stein's sentiments: We are very worried that it will still be redacted in the same way that it was today. We are a little disappointed that they're still lingering on and distracting us with other things.
The DOJ released materials that included photos and claims involving high-profile figures, such as a document alleging Epstein's introduction of a 14-year-old girl to Donald Trump. Prominent individuals named in the files include Bill Clinton and celebrities like Michael Jackson and Diana Ross, while Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing related to Epstein.
Among the releases were images of Epstein with various influential figures, but many documents remained heavily redacted. The DOJ stated it would comply with congressional requests while protecting the identities of victims, leading to further outrage over heavy redactions and concerns over transparency among survivors and advocates.
Congressman Ro Khanna, one of the lawmakers involved in pushing for the document release, has called the situation incomplete and is exploring legislative options, including potential legal action against the DOJ. As frustrations build, Epstein survivors and their advocates continue to call for full visibility into all relating evidence.
Lawmakers who pushed for these documents to see the light of day have described the DOJ's efforts as insincere, and legal experts say that the redactions may only fuel ongoing conspiracy theories. We just want all of the evidence of these crimes out there, Epstein survivor Liz Stein told the BBC.
Stein expressed concern that the DOJ was "really brazenly going against the Epstein Files Transparency Act" - the law requiring full document release. Survivors fear a slow roll-out of incomplete information without any context.
Another survivor, Marina Lacerda, who was 14 when she endured abuse by Epstein, echoed Stein's sentiments: We are very worried that it will still be redacted in the same way that it was today. We are a little disappointed that they're still lingering on and distracting us with other things.
The DOJ released materials that included photos and claims involving high-profile figures, such as a document alleging Epstein's introduction of a 14-year-old girl to Donald Trump. Prominent individuals named in the files include Bill Clinton and celebrities like Michael Jackson and Diana Ross, while Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing related to Epstein.
Among the releases were images of Epstein with various influential figures, but many documents remained heavily redacted. The DOJ stated it would comply with congressional requests while protecting the identities of victims, leading to further outrage over heavy redactions and concerns over transparency among survivors and advocates.
Congressman Ro Khanna, one of the lawmakers involved in pushing for the document release, has called the situation incomplete and is exploring legislative options, including potential legal action against the DOJ. As frustrations build, Epstein survivors and their advocates continue to call for full visibility into all relating evidence.
