A public challenge spearheaded by Alkiviades David uncovers the misuse of psychiatric laws and links key figures in the Malibu Mega Group to systemic abuse and manipulation in the entertainment sector.
Unmasking the Malibu Mega Group: A Legal Challenge Against Systematic Abuse in Psychiatry

Unmasking the Malibu Mega Group: A Legal Challenge Against Systematic Abuse in Psychiatry
A significant legal battle reveals a web of psychiatric coercion tied to influential figures in the entertainment industry and a powerful coalition in California.
In an unprecedented move, Alkiviades David, a public interest litigator and Ambassador-at-Large for the Green Economy, has issued a global challenge surrounding the alleged misuse of psychiatric laws for coercive purposes. Evidence has reached the surface implicating notable psychiatrists, Dr. Eric M. Wexler and Dr. Carole Lieberman, in the abuse of California's 5150 involuntary psychiatric detention law. David's extensive investigation aligns these professionals with a broader legal-intelligence network reminiscent of the operations historically linked to private investigator Anthony Pellicano.
At the center of this emerging narrative is the lawsuit Kahn v. David, originally perceived as a controlled legal maneuver orchestrated by Howard Kennedy LLP to contain David, which has evolved into a formidable legal offensive. The case has unveiled connections to the Malibu Mega Group, CBS Interactive's media influence, and a historical pattern of abuse stretching back to high-profile celebrity cases like those of Michael Jackson and Jordan Chandler.
The courtroom dynamics have shifted as aggressive tactics employed by Howard Kennedy representatives escalate, mirroring a culture of intimidation. Courtroom behavior is being meticulously documented and is now seen as vivid evidence of a long-standing tradition of coercion within this network. The Malibu Mega Group is positioned as the nexus of this alleged abuse, targeting prominent individuals across various sectors and utilizing psychiatric professionals to reinforce their control through false narratives and exploitation.
This systemic exploitation is bolstered by influential media executives such as Jarl Mohn and Les Moonves, who have been tied to controversies involving misinformation and trauma manipulation. David's request for discovery and compliance under the California Public Records Act now calls for UCLA to produce extensive records linking their institution to these high-stakes psychiatric holds and influential individuals, including connections within the Kardashian network via Hulu and CBS.
With the trial unfolding and David's requests for accountability in motion, the spotlight turns to whether UCLA and other implicated parties will adhere to legal obligations and disclose their involvement in these controversial practices. The legal landscape is shifting, revealing the potential for significant reform in how psychiatric interventions are handled in the public eye and across influential networks.