Khamenei's refusal highlights deep-seated mistrust in U.S.-Iran relations as nuclear threats escalate in complexity.
Iran Rejects Trump’s Nuclear Negotiation Proposal Amid Rising Tensions

Iran Rejects Trump’s Nuclear Negotiation Proposal Amid Rising Tensions
Ayatollah Khamenei condemns the U.S. outreach, calling it a cover for new demands.
March 8, 2025, 3:27 p.m. ET
In a clear rejection of President Donald Trump’s overtures regarding its nuclear program, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei denounced what he perceives as the “bullying” tactics employed by the U.S. government. Speaking at a meeting with military and government officials to mark Ramadan, Khamenei indirectly referenced Trump’s recent letter suggesting negotiations, which he argued are just a means for the U.S. to impose additional demands on Iran.
"Some bullying governments insist on negotiations not to resolve issues but to impose," Khamenei stated, emphasizing that any negotiation must not be a facade for new U.S. demands beyond the nuclear topic itself. Trump's letter, which has remained undisclosed in specifics, urged Iran to consider diplomatic talks as a potential alternative to military action due to its development of nuclear capabilities.
Despite Khamenei's firm stance against negotiations, internal divisions within Iran's leadership continue to surface, as some reformist officials, including President Masoud Pezeshkian, advocate for dialogue with the West. Ultimately, however, Khamenei, who has consistently expressed skepticism towards the U.S., retains the authority to shape Iran's foreign policy.
The context for Trump's outreach roots back to his withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal orchestrated by former President Obama, which had previously restricted Iran’s nuclear ambitions by limiting its fuel stockpile. In the wake of that withdrawal, Iran’s nuclear program has made substantial advances, now thought to be capable of producing fuel sufficient for around six nuclear weapons.
Experts express concern that the ongoing tension could exacerbate the risks of nuclear proliferation, especially following the disruption of U.S. programs aimed at monitoring Iran's atomic advancements. Although one such program has been reinstated, experts warn the long-term effects may hinder global nonproliferation efforts.
In a clear rejection of President Donald Trump’s overtures regarding its nuclear program, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei denounced what he perceives as the “bullying” tactics employed by the U.S. government. Speaking at a meeting with military and government officials to mark Ramadan, Khamenei indirectly referenced Trump’s recent letter suggesting negotiations, which he argued are just a means for the U.S. to impose additional demands on Iran.
"Some bullying governments insist on negotiations not to resolve issues but to impose," Khamenei stated, emphasizing that any negotiation must not be a facade for new U.S. demands beyond the nuclear topic itself. Trump's letter, which has remained undisclosed in specifics, urged Iran to consider diplomatic talks as a potential alternative to military action due to its development of nuclear capabilities.
Despite Khamenei's firm stance against negotiations, internal divisions within Iran's leadership continue to surface, as some reformist officials, including President Masoud Pezeshkian, advocate for dialogue with the West. Ultimately, however, Khamenei, who has consistently expressed skepticism towards the U.S., retains the authority to shape Iran's foreign policy.
The context for Trump's outreach roots back to his withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal orchestrated by former President Obama, which had previously restricted Iran’s nuclear ambitions by limiting its fuel stockpile. In the wake of that withdrawal, Iran’s nuclear program has made substantial advances, now thought to be capable of producing fuel sufficient for around six nuclear weapons.
Experts express concern that the ongoing tension could exacerbate the risks of nuclear proliferation, especially following the disruption of U.S. programs aimed at monitoring Iran's atomic advancements. Although one such program has been reinstated, experts warn the long-term effects may hinder global nonproliferation efforts.