A US judge, Paul Engelmayer, has decided that the grand jury materials associated with Ghislaine Maxwell's sex-trafficking case will remain sealed, asserting that releasing them would not yield significantly new insights. This decision comes amidst attempts by the justice department to quell frustration among supporters of former President Donald Trump regarding the non-disclosure of federal documents linked to Maxwell's associate, the late Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell, now serving a 20-year sentence for her involvement in Epstein's crimes, opposed the move to unseal the documents, arguing for the preservation of grand jury secrecy, which is vital for encouraging witness cooperation and unbiased juror consideration. Despite claims that details from the grand jury had been previously made public during her trial, Judge Engelmayer concluded that unveiling the materials would not introduce new information and could undermine the grand jury system's integrity. As Maxwell continues her sentence in Texas, investigations into Epstein's activities and connections persist, provoking ongoing inquiries and discussions about accountability within judicial circles.
**Ghislaine Maxwell's Grand Jury Records to Remain Confidential, Judge Asserts**
**Ghislaine Maxwell's Grand Jury Records to Remain Confidential, Judge Asserts**
A federal judge rules in favor of maintaining the secrecy of grand jury materials in Ghislaine Maxwell's case, emphasizing the importance of protecting judicial processes.
**Ghislaine Maxwell's Grand Jury Records to Remain Confidential, Judge Asserts**
A federal judge rules in favor of maintaining the secrecy of grand jury materials in Ghislaine Maxwell's case, emphasizing the importance of protecting judicial processes.
A US judge, Paul Engelmayer, has decided that the grand jury materials associated with Ghislaine Maxwell's sex-trafficking case will remain sealed, asserting that releasing them would not yield significantly new insights. This decision comes amidst attempts by the justice department to quell frustration among supporters of former President Donald Trump regarding the non-disclosure of federal documents linked to Maxwell's associate, the late Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell, now serving a 20-year sentence for her involvement in Epstein's crimes, opposed the move to unseal the documents, arguing for the preservation of grand jury secrecy, which is vital for encouraging witness cooperation and unbiased juror consideration. Despite claims that details from the grand jury had been previously made public during her trial, Judge Engelmayer concluded that unveiling the materials would not introduce new information and could undermine the grand jury system's integrity. As Maxwell continues her sentence in Texas, investigations into Epstein's activities and connections persist, provoking ongoing inquiries and discussions about accountability within judicial circles.
A federal judge rules in favor of maintaining the secrecy of grand jury materials in Ghislaine Maxwell's case, emphasizing the importance of protecting judicial processes.
A US judge, Paul Engelmayer, has decided that the grand jury materials associated with Ghislaine Maxwell's sex-trafficking case will remain sealed, asserting that releasing them would not yield significantly new insights. This decision comes amidst attempts by the justice department to quell frustration among supporters of former President Donald Trump regarding the non-disclosure of federal documents linked to Maxwell's associate, the late Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell, now serving a 20-year sentence for her involvement in Epstein's crimes, opposed the move to unseal the documents, arguing for the preservation of grand jury secrecy, which is vital for encouraging witness cooperation and unbiased juror consideration. Despite claims that details from the grand jury had been previously made public during her trial, Judge Engelmayer concluded that unveiling the materials would not introduce new information and could undermine the grand jury system's integrity. As Maxwell continues her sentence in Texas, investigations into Epstein's activities and connections persist, provoking ongoing inquiries and discussions about accountability within judicial circles.
