The return of MS-13 leaders to El Salvador, as part of a deal between Trump and Nayib Bukele, compromises a significant federal investigation and could potentially shield the gang from further legal repercussions.
Trump’s Deal with El Salvador: MS-13 Leaders to Return Amid Controversy

Trump’s Deal with El Salvador: MS-13 Leaders to Return Amid Controversy
In a controversial agreement with El Salvador's president, Trump has agreed to return major gang leaders, raising serious questions about the impact on ongoing federal investigations.
President Trump’s administration made headlines with its agreement to return high-ranking MS-13 leaders to El Salvador after a meeting with President Nayib Bukele earlier this year. This decision has sparked concerns among U.S. federal investigators who fear it undermines ongoing efforts to dismantle the gang.
Sources indicate that President Bukele’s rationale for requesting these deportees is tied to potential benefits for his administration, allowing the gang leaders to help stabilize political unrest by reducing violence. However, critics are raising alarms over a suspected corrupt relationship between Bukele's government and the gang, where MS-13 leaders might provide political support in return for favorable conditions in prison.
The ramifications of this agreement extend beyond political convenience; U.S. prosecutors worry that returning these leaders could derail an extensive investigation initiated during Trump’s first term by the Joint Task Force Vulcan. Obscured by the promise of justice in El Salvador, the reality remains that federal cases against these gang leaders risk stagnation or dismissal, subsequently dissuading other defendants from coming forward with testimony.
Amid growing concern, it has emerged that prosecutors have been strategically reducing charges against prominent gang leaders. Notably, César López Larios, who had been facing serious narco-terrorism charges, was sent to El Salvador in March, highlighting a shift away from accountability. This evolving narrative complicates the U.S. approach to curbing transnational gang activity and raises questions about the broader implications of such diplomatic exchanges.